14 Nov
2006
14 Nov
'06
3:23 p.m.
On Tue 14 Nov 2006 17:24, Alan DeKok wrote:
Peter Nixon <listuser@peternixon.net> wrote:
Please don't do *anything* with RFC 4590. It's existence is a figment of your imagination. Once the updated RFC comes out, we'll use that.
<g> The IETF RADIUS group decided last week that RFC 4590 was a lost cause, and would be re-issued with corrected numbers. In the mean time, implementations of RFC 4590 are based at least in part on guesses and inference, rather than a standard.
Oh Good. I thought I was going insane there for a minute... -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc