21 Sep
2006
21 Sep
'06
6:08 p.m.
On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Peter Nixon wrote:
It doesn't really bother me, but this is different behaviour to other modules... Why rewrite it at all?
If we attempt to mimic the users file processing as close as posslble, it uses the DEFAULT entries. This is exactly the reason that my take on this was to, if no User-Name is present, simply skip over the radcheck/radgroupcheck for the User-Name and jump straight to the DEFAULT profile checking. In my mind, that most closely mimics users file processing, reduces confusion of modules behaving differently, keeps the code as close to the same as possible in how it operates, and accomplishes the goal of allowing requests with no username. --Mike