4 Nov
2013
4 Nov
'13
5:12 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 02:02:32PM -0800, Alan DeKok wrote:
The code has changed for the better. But there may be cruft left over from intermediate steps.
Agreed. It was much easier parsing the new code. Another change is that the priority test has changed from >= to >, but I can't see that will matter much. It will potentially change behaviour if someone has set several codes to the same priority for some reason (previously the last result will be taken, now it will be the first). Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@le.ac.uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk>