22 May
2006
22 May
'06
2:13 p.m.
Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> wrote:
my usual "ceterum censeo": how about #335? It's *so* small and *so* useful.
And changes existing behavior. That makes me nervous. How about this: supply a patch that uses a *new* file in rlm_preprocess, say "preprocess_users". Have it behave as you describe. It will work for you, *and* it will be backwards compatible. Alan DeKok.