28 Oct
2012
28 Oct
'12
8:23 a.m.
On 10/28/2012 12:19 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 10/28/2012 10:12 AM, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Someone was complaining about the branch name v2.1.x being confusing now were on 2.2.0. There's no point in maintaining a branch for v2.1.x because there's never going to be further development.
To fixup branches in your fork:
Eww..
Related: has something funny happened to the "master" branch:
Oh dear... "funny" is a bit of an understatement. It looks like we've gone back in time 9 months.