Re: It's not a real language, honest

Wichert Akkerman wrote:

Does this mean that you will have to duplicate that or use a much more complex expression to allow both user@realm and realm/user syntaxes for a realm? That would be slightly inconvenient.

The "realms" module won't be deleted. But yes, replicating the "realms" module functionality in the new config language requires re-writing *all* of the C code in rlm_realms.c, which may not be worth it for most people. Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog