What exactly are the legalities of using GPL'd code in a completely closed source project? Don't they have to at least release the code they're using in that module along with any changes they made to that code? Then you start getting into what it links to... --Mike Alan DeKok wrote:
I think I'll investigate this further.
http://www.tinypeap.com/bin/peapd-beta1.zip
peapd.exe has multiple references to 'rlm_eap_tls" in it. It's beyond reason that anyone else could have accidentally used the same name. A number of other messages are also identical to those in our rlm_eap_tls module.
It doesn't look like they've copied much else, but even copying that is annoying.
Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html