1 Mar
2006
1 Mar
'06
8:27 a.m.
Alan DeKok wrote:
I'd be much happier if the syslog functionality was in a separate module, that didn't touch the "detail" module. The functionality is really quite separate, even if there is some overlap in the code.
I'd be OK with adding a "rlm_syslog" to the server, especially if it could log authentication success/fail, etc. in place of what's currently in the server core. The current syslog functionality is pretty bad, so replacing it with a module is a big win.
Seems perfectly reasonable. I'll see if I can create an rlm_syslog that'll work. How would you like to receive it (I presume sending a 10k diff to the mailing list probably isn't preferred)? Thanks.