Re: More additions to unlang

Jakob Hirsch wrote:

So it seem there's quite a lot of good stuff coming :)

Yeah.

Btw, if you are still looking for more ideas, what about this:

- ternary logic, like C's "condition ? yes : no"

That's hard. Mostly because the configuration file parser is bad.

Not sure how easy this is to parse, though. Maybe something like "%{cond ? true : false}" would be better.

Hmm... that may be easier to do.

- regex-like comparison operators E.g. =^ and =$ would be true if the LHS starts/ends with the RHS string. I.e.,

( "foobar" =^ "foo") -> true ( "foobar" =^ "bar") -> false ( "foobar" =$ "foo") -> false ( "foobar" =$ "bar") -> true

This would elimate the need for a lot of regex matches.

Sure... but regex matches work for now. Alan DeKok.