On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 08:49:02AM +0000, A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Actually, thinking about it, most people should be building 3.0.x packages, which doesn't need C11, so shouldn't need devtoolset-3 yet.
well, really they should be using 3.1.x as thats just about to pop out 3.2.x, the next stable release...and if enough people arent using it we'll have nasty bugs/issues on 3.2.x release like we did for 2.2.x and 3.0.x :(
and you should be using devtoolset-4 ;-)
Don't really care which version they run or what compiler they use, as long as it's not 2.1.12 or 3.0.4 (or similar age) and it compiles. Most people want a "stable" release, so that means 3.0.11 or so. The general questions on the list of "foo is broken for me in 3.0.4", when foo is a small unlang syntax issue, they've not tested in 3.0.x, and they don't provide full debug output indicates to me that they're not good candidates for testing 3.1 or 4 in production... IMO anyway. Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk>