1 Feb
2010
1 Feb
'10
2:37 p.m.
Frank Cusack wrote:
Doesn't it defeat the purpose of git vs cvs (having changesets) to have these patches as individual commits vs a single changeset????
Or is it a quirk of the way they are mailed that they look like separate changes.
If they're mailed as separate changes, they will be applied as separate changes. I'm inclined to have more small changes, because it makes any later merge *much* easier. Having a few large changes makes merges annoying. i.e. Ask me how many local "git" trees I have with changes that aren't pushed back. It's non-negligible. Alan DeKok.