20 Feb
2013
20 Feb
'13
12:41 p.m.
On 20/02/13 17:38, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 20/02/13 16:43, Alan DeKok wrote:
I put const to the left, to highlight the fact that the variable declarations are parsed right to left:
X is a pointer to a CONF_PARSER which is const
which is the same as:
X is a pointer to a const CONF_PARSER
Really? I read the first as:
(x is a pointer to a conf parser) which is const
i.e. "x", the pointer, is const. Not what is pointed to.
I'm going by this:
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/const-ptr-vs-ptr-const.html
...which sits in my bookmarks. But I freely admit to finding const in C confusing.
However - there is now some evidence that my build was screwed, and the 3.0.0 server was somehow loading an older 3.0.0 build
...sorry, "an older rlm_eap_tls"