29 Jun
2008
29 Jun
'08
3:48 a.m.
On Sun 29 Jun 2008, Alan DeKok wrote:
Peter Nixon wrote:
You may wish to have a look at rlm_acctlog :-)
Hmm... good point.
And rlm_linelog, and rlm_sql_log.
Yep :-)
We should probably replace those 3 modules with one: rlm_log. That would simplify the code, and make the logging more flexible.
I personally think that rlm_acctlog is rather neat (and we spent a decent amount of time writing and debugging it), but as long as there is another way to do exactly the same thing its ok with me. (I use it on a rather large production deployment with other logging and reporting systems that rely on its output) Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net/