2 May
2007
2 May
'07
10 a.m.
Alan DeKok wrote:
Let's give up on HUP entirely. Instead, we can implement something like:
Thanks for all of the hard work you have been doing, Alan. The decision is not mine, of course, but here is my vote. -1 Proper support for HUP is in my view an elemental requirement of any properly functioning UNIX daemon. If you feel its to complex to do it safely within the running code, you can do it like sendmail daemon does, which simply rexecs itself with its launching arguments. Sendmail doesnt support HUP if it wasnt started with a full path.