13 Oct
2009
13 Oct
'09
5:22 a.m.
Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> wrote:
Alexander Clouter wrote:
After posting I thought it should be left in but the 'rcode != 0' should be expanded to have a warning explaining that the upstream load-balancer needs to be cremated. :)
If I put together the trivial patch, would it be desired?
Sounds good to me.
I see you beat me to it on the patches. Sorry I was slow, this past week or so has been horrible :-/ Cheers -- Alexander Clouter .sigmonster says: A tautology is a thing which is tautological.