25 Mar
2013
25 Mar
'13
6:28 p.m.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 05:33:55PM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote:
I wonder if that might not be a better solution; for the == and =~ operators, loop over all and match if any matches. This seems "least surprising" to me.
I do agree with that.
You would still then want a "match all" operator, which would need to be new.
Would you? if ( ! (Tmp-String-0 != "foo") ) if ( ! (Tmp-String-0 !~ /foo/) ) Regards, Brian.