22 Oct
2009
22 Oct
'09
2:12 p.m.
Alan Buxey wrote:
we already have 2 versions that people get confused and want support on..
Version numbers keep going up, not down.
however, i would be happy to have 2.1.8 and 2.2.0 for the short term - because 2.1.x train is one that everyone is familiar with and works in the 2.1.x way where-as - as you say, 2.2.x will have new features, methods etc - it would make sense , then to say 2.1.8 for the small upgraders and 2.2.x for those wanting the new features/methods etc. ..and can we say goodbye to all 1.x 'support' ? :-)
Ok.... We can do 2.1.8 with minor changes over 2.1.7. Then, 2.2.0 with major changes (TCP, etc.) Alan DeKok.