Geoffroy Arnoud wrote:
I am wondering why the dictionary.rfc2868 isn't conform with RFC 2868.
Weird. Looking at CVS, the dictionary was created before the RFC, so my suspicion is that it matches the drafts, but not the final document
I think that the dictionary is broken, but updating it may have impact on existing deployements, using attribute values to set AVpairs.
I think that's possible, but not likely. Only the numbers 2,3, and 4 are wrong. The higher numbers were added later, and are correct. So only people using X25, ATM, or Frame-Relay will be affected... except that the NASes likely use the correct numbers, so they won't be using the wrong values for 2..4.
If required, I can post a patch.
Please. Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog