I have created the new baseURL with [1]https://packages.networkradius.com/freeradius-3.0/centos/7/ and, in fact, if I go the URL sure enough, there is version 3.0.22. However, again, when I try to list freeradius (yum list freeradius) I only get 3.0.23 in the listing. If I try to install via the actual version name then I get a yum response of "it cannot be found, nothing to do". This is really frustrating as version 3.0.22 is at the URL, as you rightly state, but it simply will not show in any listing.

I also tried the yum install direct from the URL to bypass the repo file, with no luck either. I do not want to go down the manual route of rpm installation as I am not overly expert with Linux as yet and will more than likely mess it up. Any further help would be appreciated.

...

i.e. people are paying you to do FreeRADIUS work, but you want us to work for you, for free. Hmm... a) build 3.0.22 yourself. It isn't difficult. After all, all of the source is online. b) download 3.0.22 manually, and manually install it on the customer machines c) ask RedHat how yum works. When students ask on Stack Overflow how to do their networking assignments, the response is "do your own work". Something similar applies here. Alan DeKok.

Hi Alan, Since where have I asked for anyone to complete any work for me? I simply asked if anyone had seen this issue before where the baseurl in the repo is correct, the URL for that baseurl shows 3.0.22 as well as many others. When I complete the command yum --showduplicates list freeradius it shows version 3.0.22 in the listing yet when I use yum list and yum install, all that appears to be available is 3.0.23. I do not require any or ask for any help with regarding to building something from scratch. If that is the process I end up having to use then so be it, and as you state, there is plenty of docs online to help with that. It is just a process I do not want to utilise when the yum repo should show 3.0.22 as an available package. I know how yum works and how to build a repo, what I have never completed before is a freeradius + dependencies build from scratch. That is a learnable process. So, the question, put in more simple terms is: "Has anyone seen this issue before and what was the way around it"? If no-one has seen this issue then that is all good too. My assumption was that this mailing group could be utilised to ask such a question. If that is not what this mailing group is about then maybe it should cease, as I am sure the answer to any question asked in this group is resolvable with some googling and research. Thanks Matthew for the help and Alan for the A) B) and C) options. References 1. https://deref-gmx.com/mail/client/8rkjL0zdpEA/dereferrer/?redirectUrl=https:...