Re: Quick question RE: FreeRADIUS Trusted Root CA List
Thanks Sebastian, Moving all the Trusted CA's into one file, as you suggested, fixed my problem. I still only use one server-cert. I have been testing with different sized user-certs signed by CA's of various sizes. That's the reason for the 8 different CA's. It would be the same if I wanted to authenticate user-certs signed by different commercial certificate vendors. Again thanks Larry To trust more than one CA, you simply have to copy all the root-certificates into one file: for example: CA_file = /etc/1x/trustedcas.pem I tested this with 3 CAs, and it works. Do you really need 8 different server-certificates? So, how should the server decide which certificate he must send the client? Sebastian -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger geh?rt? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger - This message (including any attachments) contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender immediately.
In ldap.c:2660, there is a condition check to see if vals_idx is zero 2660 if (!vals_idx){ 2661 pairdelete(pairs, newpair->attribute); 2662 } 2663 pairadd(&pairlist, newpair); this code line makes Radius not appending any reply attribute if the number of attribute is greater than 1. any thought in why we need this here? --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Kevin J wrote:
In ldap.c:2660, there is a condition check to see if vals_idx is zero
2660 if (!vals_idx){ 2661 pairdelete(pairs, newpair->attribute); 2662 } 2663 pairadd(&pairlist, newpair);
this code line makes Radius not appending any reply attribute if the number of attribute is greater than 1. any thought in why we need this here?
No... it deletes all existing attributes of that type the first time through the loop. Alan DeKok.
participants (3)
-
Alan DeKok -
Cerney, Lawrence -
Kevin J