redundant use of SQL-Group in "users"
All, The configurable failover mechanism allows one to say: authorize { redundant { sql1 sql2 } } ...but can one do this: DEFAULT SQL-Group == "BANNED", Auth-Type := Reject ...in a way that will failover between sql1 and sql2? I don't believe so, but just want to check before I do the fallback option (which for various reasons too tedious to go into, is a lot of work for this config).
Phil Mayers wrote:
...but can one do this:
DEFAULT SQL-Group == "BANNED", Auth-Type := Reject
...in a way that will failover between sql1 and sql2?
No, unfortunately.
I don't believe so, but just want to check before I do the fallback option (which for various reasons too tedious to go into, is a lot of work for this config).
It might be possible, but it would require some careful reconstruction of the server internals. Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog
participants (2)
-
Alan DeKok -
Phil Mayers