Re: Networkradius packages for freeradius-3.0.22-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
This comment is demeaning, and insulting. As best I can tell, it is *intended* to be demeaning and insulting.
Please don't assume you know why I wrote that comment. I absolutely did not write that comment to demean or insult anyone. Anyway, so that anyone else who may experience this issue wants to know the resolution, I will post here. At least there is a record of it then. The URL is stated as "HTTPS://packages.networkradius.com/freeradius-3.0/centos/7/" No matter what I tried I could only ever get it to list 3.0.23. So, I thought, well, may as well try http rather than https and, with using the following two commands it worked: "yum list freeradius-3.0.22*" - it listed back "freeradius-3.0.22-1.el7" "yum install freeradius-3.0.22-1.el7" radiusd -X shows no issues and the version is "3.0.22". At least that clears up the confusion, but not sure why http worked and https did not - maybe a security issue or certs. Anyway, thank you Matthew and Alan for the pointers. I will keep those in mind for future reference. A basic resolution but sometimes the basics are easily missed.
On 08/09/2021 14:02, Clive Allen wrote:
The URL is stated as "HTTPS://packages.networkradius.com/freeradius-3.0/centos/7/"
That was just the URL I sent as an example. The web site says http.
No matter what I tried I could only ever get it to list 3.0.23. So, I thought, well, may as well try http rather than https and, with using the following two commands it worked:
...
At least that clears up the confusion, but not sure why http worked and https did not - maybe a security issue or certs.
Weird. They both serve the same content, so I have no idea why one would work and the other wouldn't. -- Matthew
On Sep 8, 2021, at 9:02 AM, Clive Allen <cliveallen0907@gmx.com> wrote:
Please don't assume you know why I wrote that comment. I absolutely did not write that comment to demean or insult anyone.
If you don't intend to insult people, then don't write insulting comments. This is politeness 101. Whether or not you believe it's insulting, it is. The help I give here is *not* limited to things which could be googled. Your comment was factually incorrect, and personally demeaning towards me. It was entirely inappropriate. Alan DeKok.
participants (3)
-
Alan DeKok -
Clive Allen -
Matthew Newton