Hello, I've installed freeradius v2.1.12 and then libssl-dev. When I try to start the server in debug mode here's what I see: Ignoring EAP-Type/tls because we do not have OpenSSL support. Ignoring EAP-Type/ttls because we do not have OpenSSL support. Ignoring EAP-Type/peap because we do not have OpenSSL support. ... ... rlm_eap: No such sub-type for default EAP type peap I've also tried to re-install freeradius, as suggested in the FAQ, by doing ./configure; make; make install. But the problem still remains. So, what's missing? Maybe libssl-dev path has changed and freeradius needs to be linked? Thank you for your support and your time. Best Regards, Luca
Did you build it against libressl? Ollie Teasley Linux Administrator ISMELL.SHOES, LLC On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:40 PM, LUCA <sfire@hotmail.it> wrote:
Hello,
I've installed freeradius v2.1.12 and then libssl-dev.
When I try to start the server in debug mode here's what I see:
Ignoring EAP-Type/tls because we do not have OpenSSL support.
Ignoring EAP-Type/ttls because we do not have OpenSSL support.
Ignoring EAP-Type/peap because we do not have OpenSSL support.
...
...
rlm_eap: No such sub-type for default EAP type peap
I've also tried to re-install freeradius, as suggested in the FAQ, by doing ./configure; make; make install.
But the problem still remains. So, what's missing? Maybe libssl-dev path has changed and freeradius needs to be linked?
Thank you for your support and your time.
Best Regards, Luca
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Hello,
I've installed freeradius v2.1.12 and then libssl-dev.
When I try to start the server in debug mode here's what I see:
Ignoring EAP-Type/tls because we do not have OpenSSL support.
Ignoring EAP-Type/ttls because we do not have OpenSSL support.
Ignoring EAP-Type/peap because we do not have OpenSSL support.
...
...
rlm_eap: No such sub-type for default EAP type peap
I've also tried to re-install freeradius, as suggested in the FAQ, by doing ./configure; make; make install.
But the problem still remains. So, what's missing? Maybe libssl-dev path has changed and freeradius needs to be linked?
Thank you for your support and your time.
Best Regards, Luca
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I've installed only libssl-dev 1.0.1 and I haven't installed LibreSSL 2.1.6. Do I need to install LibreSSL? Best Regards, Luca ________________________________________ From: Freeradius-Users <freeradius-users-bounces+sfire=hotmail.it@lists.freeradius.org> on behalf of John Teasley <ollieteasley@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 12:07:19 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Freeradius doesn't find libssl-dev Did you build it against libressl? Ollie Teasley Linux Administrator ISMELL.SHOES, LLC On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:40 PM, LUCA <sfire@hotmail.it> wrote: - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:19:24PM +0000, LUCA wrote:
I've installed only libssl-dev 1.0.1 and I haven't installed LibreSSL 2.1.6. Do I need to install LibreSSL?
No, OpenSSL (which probably is libssl-dev - what O/S is this?) The configure script output will tell you whether it found the SSL libraries or not. You shouldn't be building version 2.1.12. It's obsolete. If you *really* need version 2, build 2.2.9, otherwise go for 3.0.11. Version 2 is end of life and no longer supported. Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@le.ac.uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk>
Yes, I can confirm that OpenSSL is indeed libssl-dev. I'm on Kali Linux 2.0 Machine. Yes, I've checked the configure script output. and the checking for OpenSLL support is just fine. Also just fine for the headers of openssl. If you want to I can attach the file with the output. I'm using this specific version because, I'm taking a Master Degree in Computer Science and, I need for my thesis a patch that is only available for this version. Best Regards, Saverio ________________________________________ From: Freeradius-Users <freeradius-users-bounces+sfire=hotmail.it@lists.freeradius.org> on behalf of Matthew Newton <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 12:23 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Freeradius doesn't find libssl-dev On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:19:24PM +0000, LUCA wrote:
I've installed only libssl-dev 1.0.1 and I haven't installed LibreSSL 2.1.6. Do I need to install LibreSSL?
No, OpenSSL (which probably is libssl-dev - what O/S is this?) The configure script output will tell you whether it found the SSL libraries or not. You shouldn't be building version 2.1.12. It's obsolete. If you *really* need version 2, build 2.2.9, otherwise go for 3.0.11. Version 2 is end of life and no longer supported. Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@le.ac.uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk> - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:45:05PM +0000, LUCA wrote:
I'm on Kali Linux 2.0 Machine.
OK, never heard of it. But it looks Debian-derived, in which case: http://wiki.freeradius.org/building/Build#building-packages_building-debian-...
Yes, I've checked the configure script output. and the checking for OpenSLL support is just fine.
It should be OK then. Make sure you're running the version that you actually compiled. People have made that mistake before. Old versions left on a system also often cause library problems - make sure you completely purge everything of the old version.
Also just fine for the headers of openssl. If you want to I can attach the file with the output.
Sorry, you're not likely to get much help here. As I said:
3.0.11. Version 2 is end of life and no longer supported.
I'm using this specific version because, I'm taking a Master Degree in Computer Science and, I need for my thesis a patch that is only available for this version.
I'd be quite surprised if a patch for 2.1.12 didn't apply pretty easily to 2.2.9. Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@le.ac.uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk>
I'm using this specific version because, I'm taking a Master Degree in Computer Science and, I need for my thesis a patch that is only available for this version.
I'd be quite surprised if a patch for 2.1.12 didn't apply pretty easily to 2.2.9.
Yeah, same. v2.x.x was/is pretty stable in terms of code churn. v3.0.x was a huge departure from v2.x.x so I wouldn't expect it to apply there. In any case i'm glad Universities are finally making good use of FOSS*. -Arran * I was mightily impressed that new Open University course on data analysis shipped as a Virtual Box VM deployed by Vagrant :) <bitching> Less impressed it took two hours to download a 2GB file from their CDN, but baby steps... Who knows maybe they'll offer Eduroam as a service for students as well as staff at some point in the next decade. Given that the majority of the courses they offer are remote, you'd think a priority would be giving students access to WiFi at physical Universities. </bitching> Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> FreeRADIUS development team FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2
Yeah, I'll give a try to apply the patch to another version of v2.x.x. Anyway, actually it was me to brought to the attention of my Professor. I mean he knew it, but never used so far. <bitching response="damn_right"> We, students, have access to eduroam. But DHCP not always is able to assign an IP. :( And, as you already mentioned, bandwidth is really depressing (at least on daylight when there are too many clients connected). </bitching> Back to my main question. I've just found this: https://sebastian.marsching.com/wiki/Linux/FreeRADIUS Since that kali is debian based could explain the reason of my problem. But, when I've launched configure script I've included --with-openssl-includes and the same for libraries. Maybe I should try installing the package for debian. But, sadly, I've just found the package already patched but only for i386. Luca ________________________________________ From: Freeradius-Users <freeradius-users-bounces+sfire=hotmail.it@lists.freeradius.org> on behalf of Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 2:44 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Freeradius doesn't find libssl-dev
I'm using this specific version because, I'm taking a Master Degree in Computer Science and, I need for my thesis a patch that is only available for this version.
I'd be quite surprised if a patch for 2.1.12 didn't apply pretty easily to 2.2.9.
Yeah, same. v2.x.x was/is pretty stable in terms of code churn. v3.0.x was a huge departure from v2.x.x so I wouldn't expect it to apply there. In any case i'm glad Universities are finally making good use of FOSS*. -Arran * I was mightily impressed that new Open University course on data analysis shipped as a Virtual Box VM deployed by Vagrant :) <bitching> Less impressed it took two hours to download a 2GB file from their CDN, but baby steps... Who knows maybe they'll offer Eduroam as a service for students as well as staff at some point in the next decade. Given that the majority of the courses they offer are remote, you'd think a priority would be giving students access to WiFi at physical Universities. </bitching> Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> FreeRADIUS development team FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2
Thank you to everyone. I succeed creating a deb from the source after I've patched it. ________________________________________ From: Freeradius-Users <freeradius-users-bounces+sfire=hotmail.it@lists.freeradius.org> on behalf of Matthew Newton <mcn4@leicester.ac.uk> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 2:04 AM To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Freeradius doesn't find libssl-dev On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:45:05PM +0000, LUCA wrote:
I'm on Kali Linux 2.0 Machine.
OK, never heard of it. But it looks Debian-derived, in which case: http://wiki.freeradius.org/building/Build#building-packages_building-debian-...
Yes, I've checked the configure script output. and the checking for OpenSLL support is just fine.
It should be OK then. Make sure you're running the version that you actually compiled. People have made that mistake before. Old versions left on a system also often cause library problems - make sure you completely purge everything of the old version.
Also just fine for the headers of openssl. If you want to I can attach the file with the output.
Sorry, you're not likely to get much help here. As I said:
3.0.11. Version 2 is end of life and no longer supported.
I'm using this specific version because, I'm taking a Master Degree in Computer Science and, I need for my thesis a patch that is only available for this version.
I'd be quite surprised if a patch for 2.1.12 didn't apply pretty easily to 2.2.9. Matthew -- Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <mcn4@le.ac.uk> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ithelp@le.ac.uk> - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 12 Feb 2016, at 20:19, LUCA <sfire@hotmail.it> wrote:
Thank you to everyone. I succeed creating a deb from the source after I've patched it.
Great! Don't know if you found it, but there's a 'make deb' build target that simplifies the process. -Arran Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@freeradius.org> FreeRADIUS development team FD31 3077 42EC 7FCD 32FE 5EE2 56CF 27F9 30A8 CAA2
participants (4)
-
Arran Cudbard-Bell -
John Teasley -
LUCA -
Matthew Newton