Re: Freeradius-Users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 52 (Out of Office)
I will be out of the office from June 15 to June 25, 2007. If your request can not wait until my return on June 26, please email R035@gw.njsp.org or call 609-882-2000 x.6688.
freeradius-users 06/13/07 09:54 >>>
Send Freeradius-Users mailing list submissions to freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.freeradius.org/mailman/listinfo/freeradius-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to freeradius-users-request@lists.freeradius.org You can reach the person managing the list at freeradius-users-owner@lists.freeradius.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Freeradius-Users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Problem with WLAN-MAC authentication (Alan Dekok) 2. Re: Statistics tool? (Alan Dekok) 3. Re: Problem with WLAN-MAC authentication (tnt@kalik.co.yu) 4. Re: 2.0.0 documentation for radiusd.conf. (Arran Cudbard-Bell) 5. Re: 2.0.0 documentation for radiusd.conf. (Alan Dekok) 6. Re: Support for PEAP-Mschapv2 and PEAP-GTC simultaneously? (Colleen C. Morrissey) 7. freeradius-jradius-pam (lisa laam) 8. DB handles and radius.log errors (Irina) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:35:33 +0200 From: Alan Dekok <aland@deployingradius.com> Subject: Re: Problem with WLAN-MAC authentication To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <466FE495.9080402@deployingradius.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Klaus.Albers@wavin.de wrote:
Here is the output from the debug screen... The authorization process as below loops when I switch on the encryption. Without any encryption it
works quite perfect.
Or is it 'not' possible to use mac authentication and WEP/WPA with preshared key at the same time?
That's really up to your AP. ...
Sending Access-Accept of id 188 to 172.19.0.11 port 1261
FreeRADIUS is telling the AP that the MAC is OK. If the AP tries to authenticate again with the same MAC address, it's broken. Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:36:39 +0200 From: Alan Dekok <aland@deployingradius.com> Subject: Re: Statistics tool? To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <466FE4D7.2010304@deployingradius.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Graham Beneke wrote:
Does anyone know of any system that could be used to remotely monitor if a radius server is up?
radclient? Send the server a Status-Server request, and it should respond. See radiusd.conf for more.
Something along the lines of radtest and then you would add a nasclient line for each testing location and dummy users entry that can be queried by the test location.
That's not needed. Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:49:56 +0100 From: <tnt@kalik.co.yu> Subject: Re: Problem with WLAN-MAC authentication To: "FreeRadius users mailing list" <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <H17XCPE4.1181738996.7142300.tnt@kalik.co.yu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 OK. So your client gets accepted. You will need to look at NAS logs to see where the connection breaks. Radius is working fine. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP Dana 13/6/2007, "Klaus.Albers@wavin.de" <Klaus.Albers@wavin.de> pi?e:
Here is the output from the debug screen... The authorization process as below loops when I switch on the encryption. Without any encryption it works quite perfect.
Or is it 'not' possible to use mac authentication and WEP/WPA with preshared key at the same time?
*NoIdeaWhatHappens*
- - - - - - - - -
Module: Instantiated detail (reply_log) Listening on authentication *:1812 Listening on accounting *:1813 Ready to process requests. rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 172.19.0.11:1261, id=188, length=73 User-Name = "00-19-d2-2a-61-50" User-Password = 00-19-d2-2a-61-50" Processing the authorize section of radiusd.conf modcall: entering group authorize for request 0 modcall[authorize]: module "preprocess" returns ok for request 0 radius_xlat: '../var/log/radius/radacct/172.19.0.11/auth-detail-20070613.log' rlm_detail: .../var/log/radius/radacct/%{Client-IP-Address}/auth-detail-%Y%m%d.lo g expands to .../var/log/radius/radacct/172.19.0.11/auth-detail-20070613.log modcall[authorize]: module "auth_log" returns ok for request 0 rlm_realm: No '@' in User-Name = "00-19-d2-2a-61-50", looking up realm NULL rlm_realm: No such realm "NULL" modcall[authorize]: module "suffix" returns noop for request 0 users: Matched entry 00-19-d2-2a-61-50 at line 3 modcall[authorize]: module "files" returns ok for request 0 rlm_pap: Found existing Auth-Type, not changing it. modcall[authorize]: module "pap" returns noop for request 0 modcall: leaving group authorize (returns ok) for request 0 rad_check_password: Found Auth-Type Accept rad_check_password: Auth-Type = Accept, accepting the user Login OK: [00-19-d2-2a-61-50/00-19-d2-2a-61-50] (from client wlanedv port 0) Processing the post-auth section of radiusd.conf modcall: entering group post-auth for request 0 radius_xlat: '../var/log/radius/radacct/172.19.0.11/reply-detail-20070613.log' rlm_detail: .../var/log/radius/radacct/%{Client-IP-Address}/reply-detail-%Y%m%d.l og expands to .../var/log/radius/radacct/172.19.0.11/reply-detail-20070613.log modcall[post-auth]: module "reply_log" returns ok for request 0 modcall: leaving group post-auth (returns ok) for request 0 Sending Access-Accept of id 188 to 172.19.0.11 port 1261 Finished request 0 Going to the next request - - - - - - - -
Wavin GmbH - Sitz der Gesellschaft: 49767 Twist - Registergericht: AG Osnabr?ck Abt. B 120003 - Gesch?ftsf?hrung: J?rgen Frei, Maarten Roef - Vors.d. Aufsichtsrates: Henk ten Hove
------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 13:51:36 +0100 From: Arran Cudbard-Bell <A.Cudbard-Bell@sussex.ac.uk> Subject: Re: 2.0.0 documentation for radiusd.conf. To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <466FE858.6040709@sussex.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
switch Evaluate the given string, and choose the first
matching "case"
statement inside of the current block. No statement
other than
"case" can appear in a "switch" block.
switch "string" { ... }
These work now ? :D
case Define a static string to match a parent "switch"
statement. A
"case" statement cannot appear outside of a "switch"
block.
case string { ... }
update Update a particular attribute list, based on the
attributes
given in the current block.
update <list> { attribute = value ... }
The <list> can be one of "request", "reply",
"proxy-request",
"proxy-reply", or "control". The "control" list is the
list of
attributes maintainted internally by the server that
controls
how the server processes the request. Any attribute
that does
not go in a packet on the network will generally be
placed in
the "control" list.
Control instead of config ? Cool , very nice work :) ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:59:00 +0200 From: Alan Dekok <aland@deployingradius.com> Subject: Re: 2.0.0 documentation for radiusd.conf. To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <466FEA14.7030604@deployingradius.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
switch
These work now ? :D
Yes. I just added a "default" to the switch statements, too. See the updated "man unlang".
Control instead of config ?
Yes. "config" is already used for configuration-file stuff.
Cool , very nice work :)
Thanks. I think it's nearly time for a -pre2. Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:34:07 -0400 From: "Colleen C. Morrissey" <morric@rpi.edu> Subject: Re: Support for PEAP-Mschapv2 and PEAP-GTC simultaneously? To: FreeRadius users mailing list <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Message-ID: <466FF24F.7090002@rpi.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Thanks! I had ldap returning Password-with-Header for GTC deployment and then added NT-Password for ms-chapv2. Commenting out the password-with-header for userpassword in ldap.attrmap seems to allow both to work. Which makes my life much easier :) Alan Dekok wrote:
Colleen C. Morrissey wrote:
My question is can I somehow support both simultaneously with the same freeradius daemon (I know I can simply run a second daemon on different port supporting the other but that will require me to do lots of work on infrastructure/ssids to point to different servers)? Does anybody happen to have this working and be willing to post config? Or any other ideas?
Yes. If you configure the server to know about the users clear-text password or NT-hashed password, then PEAP/GTC should "just work".
Alan DeKok. -- http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the book http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:38:32 +0200 From: "lisa laam" <laam.lisa@gmail.com> Subject: freeradius-jradius-pam To: freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org, freeradius-devel-request@lists.freeradius.org Message-ID: <b60805e90706130638q73397eacudc7841f01130c358@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi, I have a trainee. -I have to write a module witch should be able to authenticate users with username and password concatenated to OTP (One Time Password) rather than only password. - this module should be able to authenticate first the user within Active Directory and then validate the OTP. -The module that validate the OTP is Servlet (JAVA module). and i should call this programme from my module to do OTP validation. - I propose to use Freeradius to integrate this module for remote access. -For web access I proposed writting a module (PAM module) for an Apache Server./ your comment? -The probleme is that i have only two months left to implement one of the two solution (Apache or Radius) so I should choose rapidly. Witch of the two is easiest to implement?? ( note this is that this is the first time I deal with Freeradius, PAM, Apache) my questions are : 2- if i used Freeradius, then what would be easy and rapid to implement a PAM module or using JRadius (I tried to install Jradius patch, but didn't succeed)? Did you recommend me JRadius (I thougt about JRadius because the OTP validation programme is written in JAVA) ? 3- about PAM modules, I understand that we could use this independently from Freeradius Server. Is this true. would it be easier and faster to implement a standalone PAM? please need your advice. help me to decide : - write a PAM for Freeradius or wwhat a module ? - use Jradius with Freeradius or - write PAM for Apache - standalone PAM ?? or - what ? thanks in advance Lisa.
participants (1)
-
BRETT WEEAST