Prefixing Topics with Mailing list name
Hi Guys Something thats been bugging me about this list for a while is the fact that the post subjects have no indication which mailing list they are from. All the other mailing lists I'm on prefix subjects with something like "[freeradius]" but since this list (as well as freeradius-devel) don't do this it makes it quite difficult to figure out what is going on in my inbox. Could we get this changed? regards -- Graham Beneke Apolix Internet Services E-Mail: graham@apolix.co.za <mailto:graham@apolix.co.za> Cell: 082-432-1873 <callto://+27824321873> Skype: grbeneke <callto://grbeneke> WEB: www.apolix.co.za <http://www.apolix.co.za/>
On Tue 26 Sep 2006 15:01, Graham Beneke wrote:
Hi Guys
Something thats been bugging me about this list for a while is the fact that the post subjects have no indication which mailing list they are from. All the other mailing lists I'm on prefix subjects with something like "[freeradius]" but since this list (as well as freeradius-devel) don't do this it makes it quite difficult to figure out what is going on in my inbox. Could we get this changed?
regards If you check the headers you will see that all mails have:
List-Post: <mailto:freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org> Simply create a filter based on that to put the mail in whatever folder you wish. If you want something added to the subject, that is easy enough to do locally also. Personally I strip all such things from my mail as it makes the mail much less readable. Why would you want to lose half of the width of your suject to useless data? Cheers -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc
Because most other lists (for example, Sourceforge) add [prefixes] to emails, that make it easier - for me at least - to filter emails by list in Gmail and other mail clients. I'm currently subscribed to the following lists that use [prefixes]: [shorewall-users] [openvpn-users] [openvpn-devel] [lartc] [snort-users] What's more, these don't seem to be small groups either. I'd be eager to see the prefixes added, as it'd make my mail archives look a lot neater and easier to sort through. I agree about losing half the subject line to said headers, but to be honest it's not much point knowing more of the subject line if you have no idea what list it's from! Regards, Jan On 26/09/06, Peter Nixon <listuser@peternixon.net> wrote:
On Tue 26 Sep 2006 15:01, Graham Beneke wrote:
Hi Guys
Something thats been bugging me about this list for a while is the fact that the post subjects have no indication which mailing list they are from. All the other mailing lists I'm on prefix subjects with something like "[freeradius]" but since this list (as well as freeradius-devel) don't do this it makes it quite difficult to figure out what is going on in my inbox. Could we get this changed?
regards If you check the headers you will see that all mails have:
List-Post: <mailto:freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>
Simply create a filter based on that to put the mail in whatever folder you wish. If you want something added to the subject, that is easy enough to do locally also. Personally I strip all such things from my mail as it makes the mail much less readable. Why would you want to lose half of the width of your suject to useless data?
Cheers
--
Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On Tue 26 Sep 2006 21:34, Jan Mulders wrote:
Because most other lists (for example, Sourceforge) add [prefixes] to emails, that make it easier - for me at least - to filter emails by list in Gmail and other mail clients.
Well, I dont know about gmail, but every decent mail client that I can think of can rewrite headers one way or another. So can procmail.
I'm currently subscribed to the following lists that use [prefixes]:
[shorewall-users] [openvpn-users] [openvpn-devel] [lartc] [snort-users]
What's more, these don't seem to be small groups either.
I'd be eager to see the prefixes added, as it'd make my mail archives look a lot neater and easier to sort through.
I agree about losing half the subject line to said headers, but to be honest it's not much point knowing more of the subject line if you have no idea what list it's from!
As I said its easy for you to add this yourself. You should also read: http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/qralston/writing/tagging-harmful/ -- Peter Nixon http://www.peternixon.net/ PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc
Jan Mulders wrote:
Because most other lists (for example, Sourceforge) add [prefixes] to emails, that make it easier - for me at least - to filter emails by list in Gmail and other mail clients.
Create a label in Gmail and then apply it based on the sender, reply-to, or to...whichever is the list email address. I do this all the time in Gmail. It works better than filtering by subject when ppl forward from one list that has subject tags to another. -- Dennis Skinner Systems Administrator BlueFrog Internet http://www.bluefrog.com
Hi,
Because most other lists (for example, Sourceforge) add [prefixes] to emails, that make it easier - for me at least - to filter emails by list in Gmail and other mail clients.
I'm currently subscribed to the following lists that use [prefixes]:
[shorewall-users] [openvpn-users] [openvpn-devel] [lartc] [snort-users]
I filter groups based on, eg the To: or List-Id: header. this is very easy to do and saves a nice amount of subject line so I can read more subject and less mailing list identity. I used to prefer the list name in the subject...but since then I've swung over to prefering using MY filtering rather than rely on subject lines
I agree about losing half the subject line to said headers, but to be honest it's not much point knowing more of the subject line if you have no idea what list it's from!
I'd disagree. I often slip into reading some random but interesting email due to the subject line - of lists that I dont filter and would normally mass delete at the end of the month due to no reading time. alan
participants (5)
-
A.L.M.Buxey@lboro.ac.uk -
Dennis Skinner -
Graham Beneke -
Jan Mulders -
Peter Nixon