Hi Alan, These messages were recorded in the log file. Thanks, Chris Howley Jan 25 08:34:33 XXXXXXX radiusd[51221]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx Jan 25 08:47:30 XXXXXXX radiusd[150897]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx Jan 25 08:51:47 XXXXXXX radiusd[155484]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx Jan 25 08:54:47 XXXXXXX radiusd[157037]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx Jan 25 08:57:36 XXXXXXX radiusd[158316]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx
On Jan 25, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Chris Howley <C.P.Howley@leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
Hi Alan,
I'm going to start ignoring messages which begin with "Hi Alan". I'm not the only person on the list, and this list isn't my personal inbox.
These messages were recorded in the log file.
3.1 is unsupported. If it works, good. If not, please submit a patch to fix it. Alan DeKok.
Hi,
Jan 25 08:34:33 XXXXXXX radiusd[51221]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx Jan 25 08:47:30 XXXXXXX radiusd[150897]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx Jan 25 08:51:47 XXXXXXX radiusd[155484]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx Jan 25 08:54:47 XXXXXXX radiusd[157037]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx Jan 25 08:57:36 XXXXXXX radiusd[158316]: ASSERT FAILED src/main/state.c[646]: request->state_ctx
I *believe* this is sorted by changing line 627 in src/main/state.c from if (request->state && !data) return true; to if (!request->state && !data) return true; alan
participants (3)
-
A.L.M.Buxey＠lboro.ac.uk -
Alan DeKok -
Chris Howley