Hi, I am getting valid response from fR server. But not able to change access level How to set access(privilege) level to radius user.     I know how to set the sane if I am using Cisco avpair. But currently I want to use NET user access level info.     Thanks in advance,     Kavya ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: freeradius-users-owner@lists.freeradius.org Date: 22-Jan-2015 6:06 am Subject: The results of your email commands To: kavyamelinmaneprabhakar@gmail.com Cc:

The results of your email command are provided below. Attached is your original message.

- Unprocessed:     How to set access(privilege) level to radius user.     I know how to set the sane if I am using Cisco avpair. But currently I want to use NET user access level info.     Thanks in advance,     Kavya     On 22-Jan-2015 2:28 am, freeradius-users-request@lists.freeradius.org wrote:     >     > Send Freeradius-Users mailing list submissions to     > freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org     >     > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit     > http://lists.freeradius.org/mailman/listinfo/freeradius-users     > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to     > freeradius-users-request@lists.freeradius.org     >     > You can reach the person managing the list at     > freeradius-users-owner@lists.freeradius.org     >     > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific     > than "Re: Contents of Freeradius-Users digest..."     >     >     > Today's Topics:

- Ignored:     >     > ���� 1. Re: Configure SQL to timeout requests rather than rejecting     > ���������� if no connections available (Alan DeKok)     > ���� 2. RE: Configure SQL to timeout requests rather than rejecting     > ���������� if no connections available (Noah Engelberth)     > ���� 3. encrypted response (parameter) (the2nd@otpme.org)     > ���� 4. Re: encrypted response (parameter) (Alan DeKok)     > ���� 5. Re: encrypted response (parameter) (the2nd@otpme.org)     > ���� 6. Re: encrypted response (parameter) (Alan DeKok)     > ���� 7. Re: encrypted response (parameter) (the2nd@otpme.org)     >     >     > ----------------------------------------------------------------------     >     > Message: 1     > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:57:55 -0500     > From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>     > To: FreeRadius users mailing list     > <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>     > Subject: Re: Configure SQL to timeout requests rather than rejecting     > if no connections available     > Message-ID: <290AA10E-81DA-451A-8CC4-C9517E1C1EC8@deployingradius.com>     > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252     >     > On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:20 PM, Noah Engelberth <nengelberth@team-meta.net> wrote:     > > So, "in your existing configuration" means what I have with the virtual server not responding on an SQL "fail"?�� Or to revert that change and then add that post-proxy handling?     >     > �� <sigh>�� What I said was very clear.�� I said to change ONE thing.�� The PROXY.�� I didn?t say to revert a change.     >     > > My server configuration currently (with the virtual server not responding on SQL "fail") is:     >     > �� I didn?t ask for that.�� I asked for the DEBUG OUTPUT.     >     > �� Paying attention would be nice.�� Following instructions would be better.     >     > > So, basically, the mikrotik_realm module looks at the realm name that came in from the client (which might be requesting hotspot.metalink.net or dhcp.metalink.net) and update the username to username@realm.�� Suffix then proxies it off to the virtual server named platreg_<realm>     >     > �� NO.�� I said that the suffix module DOES NOT DO PROXYING.     >     > �� Please pay attention.     >     > > I can't easily run the live servers in debug mode -- they're under fairly heavy volume and it's hard to get useful information from them.�� I have fairly high request logging turned up at the moment, and I can try to set up my debug environment with a test case that could replicate the issue if necessary.     >     > �� If only there was a free ?radius client? tool which would let you send test packets.     >     > �� If only it was possible to create a test configuration *independent* of the live configuration, where test packets could be sent.     >     > �� Yes, I find this frustrating.�� I?m trying to help you, and you?re making it as difficult as possible.     >     > �� Alan DeKok.     >     >     >     > ------------------------------     >     > Message: 2     > Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:14:42 +0000     > From: Noah Engelberth <nengelberth@team-meta.net>     > To: FreeRadius users mailing list     > <freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org>     > Subject: RE: Configure SQL to timeout requests rather than rejecting     > if no connections available     > Message-ID: <c39fc7ee4d7244f58a50402868be8fbe@def-exch.dh.local>     > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"     >     >     > >���� <sigh>�� What I said was very clear.�� I said to change ONE thing.�� The PROXY.�� I     > > didn't say to revert a change.     > >     > I read your previous as "The issue is that you don't want to respond to the *client*.�� You *do* want the virtual server to respond to the proxy."     >     > This made me think: "The previous change I made to make the virtual server not respond in the case of SQL failing is causing the virtual server not to respond the proxy, so I must need