1.1.7 %{foo:-0} syntax?
Does 1.1.7 use the newer %{%{foo}:-0} or the older %{foo:-0} format? Or is it biformatual? -- hugh
Alan DeKok said:
Hugh Messenger wrote:
Does 1.1.7 use the newer %{%{foo}:-0} or the older %{foo:-0} format?
It uses the old format.
OK, the reason I asked was that the sql.conf in the 1.1.7 from the day I posted that question had the new format, but that appears to have been fixed in todays update.
Alan DeKok.
-- hugh
On Mon 16 Jul 2007, Hugh Messenger wrote:
Alan DeKok said:
Hugh Messenger wrote:
Does 1.1.7 use the newer %{%{foo}:-0} or the older %{foo:-0} format?
It uses the old format.
OK, the reason I asked was that the sql.conf in the 1.1.7 from the day I posted that question had the new format, but that appears to have been fixed in todays update.
Yep. That was my mistake. I found it during testing today. -- Peter Nixon http://peternixon.net/
participants (3)
-
Alan DeKok -
Hugh Messenger -
Peter Nixon