Dear Sirs, I just made diff between 1.0.4 and 1.1.0 rlm_python sources and they appear to be the same. When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ? We develop an application that uses rlm_python and we would like our customers to be able to run it against "out of box" compiled freeradius. It would be bad to tell each customer "You know, our application uses rlm_python, which is still marked experimental and therefore You need to recompile freeradius ..." We confirm that we didn't experience any problem with rlm_python. It behave quite robust and predictable. Cheers, Ilia Chipitsine
Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?
The module rlm_python is still "experimental". There are known issues with this module. http://bugs.freeradius.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227 -- Nicolas Baradakis
Ilia Chipitsine wrote:
When that module will become non-experimental ? It has not been changing for years, maybe it can become regular module in 1.1.0 ?
The module rlm_python is still "experimental". There are known issues with this module.
in the end of that discussion there's rewritten rlm_python.c if existing rlm_python is buggy why not to use better version ?
-- Nicolas Baradakis
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Ilia Chipitsine <ilia@paramon.ru> wrote:
if existing rlm_python is buggy why not to use better version ?
Because the primary FreeRADIUS developers don't use python. Please use the updated module yourself, and if it works for you, email the list and say so. If no one says that the new module is better, it won't go in. Alan DeKok.
participants (3)
-
Alan DeKok -
Ilia Chipitsine -
Nicolas Baradakis