RE: recommended restart-wrapper for freeradius
but from the doc/supervide-radiusd.txt we have "Note: The radwatch script that used to be part of this distribution, is depreciated and SHOULD NOT BE USED." is it still safe to use? tariq -----Original Message----- From: freeradius-users-bounces@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces@lists.freeradius.org]On Behalf Of Nicolas Baradakis Sent: 21 October 2005 14:28 To: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: recommended restart-wrapper for freeradius Tariq Rashid wrote:
hi - we're having the freeradius 1.0.2 daemon dying occasionally for mysterious reasons - we're still investuigating the cause.
You should upgrade to 1.0.5. http://freeradius.org/security.html
running in the foreground in an infinite loop is also not ideal as this means the daemon doesn't run in threaded mode.
I don't understand. This shouldn't be a problem.
can anyone recommend a good way to monitor/restart the daemon.
You could look at scripts/radwatch in the FreeRADIUS source tree. -- Nicolas Baradakis - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
"Tariq Rashid" <tariq.rashid@uk.easynet.net> wrote:
"Note: The radwatch script that used to be part of this distribution, is depreciated and SHOULD NOT BE USED."
is it still safe to use?
Probably, but it's no longer maintained. Alan DeKok.
Tariq Rashid wrote:
but from the doc/supervide-radiusd.txt we have
"Note: The radwatch script that used to be part of this distribution, is depreciated and SHOULD NOT BE USED."
is it still safe to use?
I think it is. For example, it's used in the initscript from Gentoo. http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/net-dialup/freeradius/files/radius... Nicolas Baradakis -- A: Yes.
Q: Are you sure?
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
participants (3)
-
Alan DeKok -
Nicolas Baradakis -
Tariq Rashid