Marc-Henri Boisis-delavaud wrote:
Hello Were Can I found patches for cisco wlse work ? Marc
Huh... my best guess would be cisco.com :) -- Groeten, Regards, Salutations, Thor Spruyt M: +32 (0)475 67 22 65 E: thor.spruyt@telenet.be W: www.thor-spruyt.com www.salesguide.be www.telenethotspot.be
Thor Spruyt wrote:
Marc-Henri Boisis-delavaud wrote:
Hello Were Can I found patches for cisco wlse work ? Marc
Huh... my best guess would be cisco.com :)
Here are the patches. These were made against FreeRadius 1.0.0 Here's how to apply them: 1. mkdir patchdir, cd patchdir 2. gzip -dc freeradius-1.0.0-wlse-patches.tar.gz |tar -xvf - 3. Grab the FreeRadius-1.0.0 source code and extract it. 4. cd freeradius-1.0.0/src/modules/rlm_eap 5. Apply the eap.c patch: patch </patchdir/freeradius-1.0.0-eap-patch 6. Apply the mem.c patch: patch </patchdir/freeradius-1.0.0-mem-patch 7. Apply the rlm_leap patch: cd freeradius-1.0.0/src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_leap, patch </patchdir/freeradius-1.0.0-leap-patch Configure and compile as usual. Thanks should be given to Richard Timsit and John Koen for their assistance in providing/testing these patches. Best Regards, -- Mike McNeil Sr. Network Engineer University of California Berkeley Ph: 510-643-4656
How about submitting them to bugs.freeradius.org? -- Groeten, Regards, Salutations, Thor Spruyt M: +32 (0)475 67 22 65 E: thor.spruyt@telenet.be W: www.thor-spruyt.com www.salesguide.be www.telenethotspot.be ----- Original Message ----- From: M.McNeil To: FreeRadius users mailing list Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 6:44 PM Subject: Re: wlse leap patches Here are the patches. These were made against FreeRadius 1.0.0 Here's how to apply them: 1. mkdir patchdir, cd patchdir 2. gzip -dc freeradius-1.0.0-wlse-patches.tar.gz |tar -xvf - 3. Grab the FreeRadius-1.0.0 source code and extract it. 4. cd freeradius-1.0.0/src/modules/rlm_eap 5. Apply the eap.c patch: patch </patchdir/freeradius-1.0.0-eap-patch 6. Apply the mem.c patch: patch </patchdir/freeradius-1.0.0-mem-patch 7. Apply the rlm_leap patch: cd freeradius-1.0.0/src/modules/rlm_eap/types/rlm_leap, patch </patchdir/freeradius-1.0.0-leap-patch Configure and compile as usual. Thanks should be given to Richard Timsit and John Koen for their assistance in providing/testing these patches. Best Regards, -- Mike McNeil Sr. Network Engineer University of California Berkeley Ph: 510-643-4656 - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
I have Freeradius running on a Fedora Core 4 server and it has been running stable for about a week. I transistioned from Cistron, and although the process took me a bit, I was able to use the documentation, comments in the config files, and mailing list archives to find the information needed to configure, test, and run Freeradius. The only question I am left with is when running radwho - in the 'What' column there are mostly PPP entries, which I expect. However, there are a few 'shell' entries, which I don't know if they are ok or not. I am using PAM authentication and standard Linux accounts for users. These users are defined as nologin for thier shell so I have made a mistake somewhere in my configuration. The users themselves do not notice a difference, I am only concerned that it is a vulnerability or misconfiguration on my part. the users file in raddb only has PPP, CSLIP, and SLIP in the default hint entries, and only PAM as auth-type. Service type is Framed-User. In reading the documentation and using google, I cannot determine what spcifically influences the entry in the 'What' column in my configuration. This could be my Freeradius configuration, my NAS (Ascend Max), or my users account definition. I just cannot determine which component is doing this. Any help pointing me in the right direction would be appriciated. David
participants (4)
-
David Stickelman -
M.McNeil -
Marc-Henri Boisis-delavaud -
Thor Spruyt