Maybe a 1.1.0?
aland at ox.org
Thu Dec 1 21:02:04 CET 2005
Michael Griego <mgriego at utdallas.edu> wrote:
> I would agree with this, however we should likely follow a more common
> versioning approach... like major.minor.release where the minor version
> number is odd for beta and even for stable or just major.minor for
> stable and major.minor(b)release (ie 2.0b1) for betas.
Sure. 1.1.x is for new features. If it looks good, we can release
1.2 with only bug fixes.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel