Maybe a 1.1.0?

[Alan DeKok]

Michael Griego <mgriego at utdallas.edu> wrote:
> I would agree with this, however we should likely follow a more common 
> versioning approach... like major.minor.release  where the minor version 
> number is odd for beta and even for stable or just major.minor for 
> stable and major.minor(b)release (ie 2.0b1) for betas.

  Sure.  1.1.x is for new features.  If it looks good, we can release
1.2 with only bug fixes.

  Alan DeKok.