Maybe a 1.1.0?

[Frank Cusack]

On December 1, 2005 8:34:11 AM -0600 Michael Griego <mgriego at utdallas.edu> wrote:
> I would agree with this, however we should likely follow a more common versioning approach...
> like major.minor.release  where the minor version number is odd for beta and even for stable or
> just major.minor for stable and major.minor(b)release (ie 2.0b1) for betas.

Don't we do that already?  1.1 is newer than 1.0, etc.

Please god, no even/odd numbering.

-frank