Maybe a 1.1.0?
jmaimon at ttec.com
Wed Nov 30 01:13:56 CET 2005
Alan DeKok wrote:
> In the mean time, the CVS head can continue with it's re-writes, and
> IPv6 work.
This part I like. Especialy if it was open to more changes.
> Also, having a 1.1.0 with a few minor changes means that
> the step to 2.x is less problematic.
I know I had few problems migrating to CVS head from 1.0.x
What would be different? What more than a sdiff on radiusd.conf would be
> Thoughts? Opinions? Rocks & bricks?
> Alan DeKok.
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
More information about the Freeradius-Devel