Maybe a 1.1.0?

[Joe Maimon]

Alan DeKok wrote:

>   In the mean time, the CVS head can continue with it's re-writes, and
> IPv6 work.  

This part I like. Especialy if it was open to more changes.

> Also, having a 1.1.0 with a few minor changes means that
> the step to 2.x is less problematic.

I know I had few problems migrating to CVS head from 1.0.x

What would be different? What more than a sdiff on radiusd.conf would be 
neccessary?

> 
>   Thoughts?  Opinions?  Rocks & bricks?
>
>   Alan DeKok.
> - 
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
> 
>