Maybe a 1.1.0? 
    Alan DeKok 
    aland at ox.org
       
    Wed Nov 30 01:35:50 CET 2005
    
    
  
Joe Maimon <jmaimon at ttec.com> wrote:
> I know I had few problems migrating to CVS head from 1.0.x
  Yeah, a bunch of modules changed.
> What would be different? 
  Ideally, a bunch of minor tweaks to a bunch of modules.  e.g. recent
changes to rlm_files, rlm_attr_filter, to generalize them.  Fixes in
rlm_pap & rlm_ldap, to do more auto-discovery and require less admin
configuration.  Fixes to rlm_digest.  New rlm_sql_log, and
documentation.
  i.e. much of the work in the CVS head that's easy to back-port, but
not the completely invasive changes live full IPv6 support.
  The idea is to have a release that's easy to do, and gets people
part-way to 2.x, without making them change everything all at once.
> What more than a sdiff on radiusd.conf would be neccessary?
  Telling people to *read* the new radiusd.conf would help.  Things
like the "unix" module removing support for caching /etc/passwd, which
I've never liked.
  Alan DeKok.
    
    
More information about the Freeradius-Devel
mailing list