Maybe a 1.1.0?

Alan DeKok aland at
Wed Nov 30 01:35:50 CET 2005

Joe Maimon <jmaimon at> wrote:
> I know I had few problems migrating to CVS head from 1.0.x

  Yeah, a bunch of modules changed.

> What would be different? 

  Ideally, a bunch of minor tweaks to a bunch of modules.  e.g. recent
changes to rlm_files, rlm_attr_filter, to generalize them.  Fixes in
rlm_pap & rlm_ldap, to do more auto-discovery and require less admin
configuration.  Fixes to rlm_digest.  New rlm_sql_log, and

  i.e. much of the work in the CVS head that's easy to back-port, but
not the completely invasive changes live full IPv6 support.

  The idea is to have a release that's easy to do, and gets people
part-way to 2.x, without making them change everything all at once.

> What more than a sdiff on radiusd.conf would be neccessary?

  Telling people to *read* the new radiusd.conf would help.  Things
like the "unix" module removing support for caching /etc/passwd, which
I've never liked.

  Alan DeKok.

More information about the Freeradius-Devel mailing list