rfc4590

[Alan DeKok]

"Alexander Schrab" <Alexander.Schrab at axis.com> wrote:
> Well, the thing is that my patch only replaces the attributes from the
> draft version. So it's an either or situation. It seems like the draft
> version has some momentum already, but the rfc should really be the way
> to go (no strange subattributes and such).

  There's no harm in having both.

>  It's more of a political decision, should freeradius suppotr only
> the rfc, only the draft or both? Maybe you can point me in the
> direction of the people/person who made the digest module?

  That was me.

  I haven't looked at RFC 4590, but if the old digest attributes can
be modified to look like the new ones, that would appear to be a
solution.  i.e.

  authorize: if old-style, re-format, and make check items as old
  authenticate: do new-style.  If check item is marked as old,
                send response in old format.

  Alan DeKok.

--
http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog