SQL config file names
aland at deployingradius.com
Mon Jul 23 15:58:44 CEST 2007
Peter Nixon wrote:
> Why? What is the benefit of making people import two schema's instead of one?
> I don't see how having one extra, possibly unused table in the default
> schema is at all harmfull, and in my opinion the added "cleanliness" does
> not make up for the extra command every user will have to type when they
> want to setup sqlippool (Which I believe is going to be a wildly popular
> module in the near future :-)
That's what documentation && makefiles are for.
We could have "make install-schema" which installs the schemas. At
that point, it doesn't matter if they're in one file, or 10,000 files.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel