HUP handling: a thought
listuser at peternixon.net
Wed May 2 16:14:03 CEST 2007
On Wed 02 May 2007, Joe Maimon wrote:
> Alan DeKok wrote:
> > Let's give up on HUP entirely. Instead, we can implement something
> > like:
> > http://www.linuxappliancedesign.com/projects/rta/
> Thanks for all of the hard work you have been doing, Alan.
> The decision is not mine, of course, but here is my vote.
> Proper support for HUP is in my view an elemental requirement of any
> properly functioning UNIX daemon.
> If you feel its to complex to do it safely within the running code, you
> can do it like sendmail daemon does, which simply rexecs itself with its
> launching arguments. Sendmail doesnt support HUP if it wasnt started
> with a full path.
Yep. I vote for this solution as well in absence of anything more elegant.
The system should do _something_ when it receives -HUP (other than crash). It
this turns out to be a full restart, then so be it...
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc
More information about the Freeradius-Devel