It's not a real language, honest

[Alan Dekok]

Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Does this mean that you will have to duplicate that or use a much more
> complex expression to allow both user at realm and realm/user syntaxes
> for a realm? That would be slightly inconvenient.

  The "realms" module won't be deleted.

  But yes, replicating the "realms" module functionality in the new
config language requires re-writing *all* of the C code in rlm_realms.c,
which may not be worth it for most people.

  Alan DeKok.
--
  http://deployingradius.com       - The web site of the book
  http://deployingradius.com/blog/ - The blog