EAP proxing with client-balance
alex at digriz.org.uk
Tue Oct 13 11:22:05 CEST 2009
Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com> wrote:
> Alexander Clouter wrote:
>> After posting I thought it should be left in but the 'rcode != 0' should
>> be expanded to have a warning explaining that the upstream load-balancer
>> needs to be cremated. :)
>> If I put together the trivial patch, would it be desired?
> Sounds good to me.
I see you beat me to it on the patches. Sorry I was slow, this past
week or so has been horrible :-/
.sigmonster says: A tautology is a thing which is tautological.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel