Sponsored development rlm_ldap and ocsp

[Alan DeKok]

John Dennis wrote:
> I think folks would appreciate the functionality in 2.1.10 so I would
> agree to adding it to 2.1.10. However I would argue that would be
> dependent on getting the schema reviewed first. Nothing worse than
> having a schema get out into the field, have folks start using it and
> then discover it needs to be modified.

  Yup.  But I don't think many people are competent to review the
schema.  From what I know of LDAP, it looks reasonable.

> Does FreeRADIUS have a block of OID's?

  Yes.  The 11344 private enterprise code has been assigned to FreeRADIUS.

> Are the client values case sensitive?

  The secret, nastype, nas password, and virtual server names are case
sensitive.  The other fields are used only for printing, not for
lookups.  So they can be case insensitive, as they don't matter.

> (I know I could figure those questions out on my own but I'm a little
> time constrained at the moment).

  I know the feeling.

  Alan DeKok.