Should MAX_STRING_LEN be 253?

[Makarand Pradhan]

Appreciate your prompt response Alan.

I do understand that I have to split the EAP message every 253 bytes. I 
can define it as a constant in my code, but I would prefer to use a 
constant defined by the freeradius package. MAX_STRING_LEN appeared to 
be the obvious choice.

I'm using (MAX_STRING_LEN - 1), but if MAX_STRING_LEN is used for some 
other internal reasons to FreeRadius, it may change in the future 
breaking my code. That's my only worry.

Thanks for your time.

Warm Rgds,
Makarand.

On 18/08/11 07:18 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Makarand Pradhan wrote:
>    
>> As the constant MAX_STRING_LEN is being used in our code to split a big
>> EAP message into multiple segments, we tend to loose one byte in every
>> segment causing authentication failure (malformed packet received).
>>      
>    Your code is wrong... it should be splitting EAP messages every 253
> octets.
>
>    
>> Question:
>> Based on the above analysis it was felt that the constant should be 253.
>> Should the constant be changed to 253 or is there any other reason for
>> keeping it at 254?
>>      
>    The constant is 254 for reasons internal to FreeRADIUS.
>
>    Alan DeKok.
> -
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
>
>    


-- 
___________________________________________________________________________
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information.  If you are
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this
e-mail and any copies.  Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other than the
intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.
_____________________________________________________________________