v2.1.x branch renamed to v2.x.x

[Phil Mayers]

On 10/28/2012 12:19 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 10/28/2012 10:12 AM, Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>> Someone was complaining about the branch name v2.1.x being confusing
>> now were on 2.2.0. There's no point in maintaining a branch for v2.1.x
>> because there's never going to be further development.
>>
>> To fixup branches in your fork:
>
> Eww..
>
> Related: has something funny happened to the "master" branch:
>

Oh dear... "funny" is a bit of an understatement. It looks like we've 
gone back in time 9 months.