freeradius: failed linking to rlm_eap2
p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Mon Sep 17 20:40:01 CEST 2012
On 09/17/2012 06:30 PM, alan buxey wrote:
>>> EAP-PSK doesn't look terribly hard (unlike EAP-FAST or EAP-TEAP which
> TEAP is the way forward though...its the ONLY future IETF tunneled EAP method :-)
...nicely summarises my thinking on the matter.
It has has a few small advantages. None are compelling to me, and I
think I'm pretty typical. Why would someone in my position move away
More to the point, why would someone in my position spend hundreds of
man-hours deciphering the TEAP RFC and writing the code, when it's
notably more complex than PEAP for little gain?
More information about the Freeradius-Devel