freeradius: failed linking to rlm_eap2

Stelian Ionescu sionescu at
Mon Sep 17 20:53:08 CEST 2012

On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:40 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> ...nicely summarises my thinking on the matter.
> It has has a few small advantages. None are compelling to me, and I 
> think I'm pretty typical. Why would someone in my position move away 
> from TEAP?
> More to the point, why would someone in my position spend hundreds of 
> man-hours deciphering the TEAP RFC and writing the code, when it's 
> notably more complex than PEAP for little gain? says that
TEAP is "based on EAP-FAST [RFC4851] with some minor changes", of which
you can find implementations around

Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the Freeradius-Devel mailing list