freeradius: failed linking to rlm_eap2
sionescu at cddr.org
Mon Sep 17 20:53:08 CEST 2012
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 19:40 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
> ...nicely summarises my thinking on the matter.
> It has has a few small advantages. None are compelling to me, and I
> think I'm pretty typical. Why would someone in my position move away
> from TEAP?
> More to the point, why would someone in my position spend hundreds of
> man-hours deciphering the TEAP RFC and writing the code, when it's
> notably more complex than PEAP for little gain?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-emu-eap-tunnel-method-01 says that
TEAP is "based on EAP-FAST [RFC4851] with some minor changes", of which
you can find implementations around
Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Freeradius-Devel