p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk
Thu Jul 25 11:14:41 CEST 2013
Bill Schoolfield <bill at billmax.com> wrote:
>DoWe have developed a module that we intend to include in our rpm
>package. For licensing reasons we will not be distributing freeradius
>itself. Instead the freeradius rpm will be a pre-requisite.
>It would be nice if the binary packages provided enough files to build
>module. Library files are there, but other needed build and compile
>files are not. I assume that this is not in the cards in any future
>Our concern is the build process. As it is now we have the install the
>tarball, build it, then build our module. Doable yes.
>Can you see a better way?
>List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
What kind of "licensing" reasons?
Sent from my phone with, please excuse brevity and typos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Freeradius-Devel