bill at billmax.com
Thu Jul 25 15:14:14 CEST 2013
We can't distribute FreeRadius w/o GPL-ing our entire package. Anyway I
don't think that's not particularly pertinent (I should not have
On a client's host I think I'm leaning towards installing the freeradius
rpm, then during our install process, "layer in" the needed files (to
build and install our module). That way we don't have to build out a
entire radius instance on our build machines.
Any thought to including the necessary src files so folks can build
their modules from a rpm distro?
On 7/25/2013 7:28 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Bill Schoolfield wrote:
>> DoWe have developed a module that we intend to include in our rpm
>> package. For licensing reasons we will not be distributing freeradius
>> itself. Instead the freeradius rpm will be a pre-requisite.
> If you have a module which depends on FreeRADIUS, your choices are:
> a) GPL the module
> b) don't redistribute the module
> That's pretty much what the GPL says. (Modulo 3 pages of legalese)
> Alan DeKok.
> List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/devel.html
More information about the Freeradius-Devel