Version 2.2.2 has been released
aland at deployingradius.com
Mon Nov 4 23:02:32 CET 2013
Matthew Newton wrote:
> Is there any way that condition (priority <= 0) can ever be false?
I'll take a look.
> It's subsequenty set to c->actions[result] on line 825, which is
> then tested on line 832, but at 846 we jump back to 'redo', which
> immediately sets it back to -1 again.
> So the condition on 806 _looks_ redundant? It wasn't there in the
> v2.2.0 test:
The code has changed for the better. But there may be cruft left over
from intermediate steps.
More information about the Freeradius-Devel