Service-Type: Outbound vs. Outbound-User
aland at ox.org
Sat Jul 9 16:58:03 CEST 2005
Gerald Krause <gk at ax.tc> wrote:
> do not misunderstood me: i'am not using "outbound" because of faith in
> cisco. not at all :). i use it because it looks rfc conform - the examples
> from cisco only second that.
Please go back and read what I wrote in my first response.
The names are IRRELEVANT. The dictionaries matter only to the
RADIUS server and it's configuration files. I could rename all of the
attributes & valuess to random words from the dictionary, and it would
make *no* difference to the clients.
> it was my fault that i stumbled again over this (because i have done the
> appropriate dictionary modifications more then once in the past) but this
> time i asked myself (and afterwards the list) for the rfc-standard...
Many, many, attributes and values in FreeRADIUS have slight
differences from the RFC's. Many implementation decisions in
FreeRADIUS do not follow the RFC's, either.
On a positive note, it looks like FreeRADIUS will be referenced in
an upcoming RFC. Some decisions made by Raghu a while back which
didn't follow the RFC's ended up being better than the RFC suggestions.
More information about the Freeradius-Users