ippool

[Miguel Sennoun]

In fact I need a FreeRadius listening on 1912... ports and one listening on
1812
 ports.  So Perhaps it is not necessary but I believe it is.

 

  _____  

De : freeradius-users-bounces at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces at lists.freeradius.org] De la part de
Seferovic Edvin
Envoyé : jeudi 16 juin 2005 14:43
À : 'FreeRadius users mailing list'
Objet : RE: ippool

 

Hi,

 

why do you actually need two different instances of freeradius?


Regards,

 

Edvin Seferovic

 

  _____  

From: freeradius-users-bounces at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces at lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Miguel
Sennoun
Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2005 14:33
To: 'FreeRadius users mailing list'
Subject: ippool

 

Hi,

Has anyone an idea on the best solution to run two freeradius on the same
machine. I tried with one installation that uses different conf and log
directories but I wonder if all works well with the second instance.

For example the radwho has no parameters to indicate which instance to
consider. Perhaps ther is other problems I didn’t noticed.

Perhaps the best solution is to make two different install. Any advices?

Thanks

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20050616/66339747/attachment.html>