ippool
Miguel Sennoun
miguel at b2i-toulouse.com
Thu Jun 16 15:59:19 CEST 2005
In fact I need a FreeRadius listening on 1912... ports and one listening on
1812
ports. So Perhaps it is not necessary but I believe it is.
_____
De : freeradius-users-bounces at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces at lists.freeradius.org] De la part de
Seferovic Edvin
Envoyé : jeudi 16 juin 2005 14:43
À : 'FreeRadius users mailing list'
Objet : RE: ippool
Hi,
why do you actually need two different instances of freeradius?
Regards,
Edvin Seferovic
_____
From: freeradius-users-bounces at lists.freeradius.org
[mailto:freeradius-users-bounces at lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Miguel
Sennoun
Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2005 14:33
To: 'FreeRadius users mailing list'
Subject: ippool
Hi,
Has anyone an idea on the best solution to run two freeradius on the same
machine. I tried with one installation that uses different conf and log
directories but I wonder if all works well with the second instance.
For example the radwho has no parameters to indicate which instance to
consider. Perhaps ther is other problems I didnt noticed.
Perhaps the best solution is to make two different install. Any advices?
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeradius.org/pipermail/freeradius-users/attachments/20050616/66339747/attachment.html>
More information about the Freeradius-Users
mailing list